Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687861›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

"Comparison among 3 maxillomandibular fixation techniques for management of mandibular fractures - A prospective randomized study".

Devender Tigraniya, Ankita Dahiya, Virendra Singh, Amrish Bhagol, Rajiv Tanwar, Nilesh Bagde

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Devender TigraniyaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.
Ankita DahiyaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.
Virendra SinghDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.
Amrish BhagolDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.
Rajiv TanwarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.
Nilesh BagdeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, 124001, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Erich arch bar has been a traditional method for maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) in the closed management of mandibular fractures, but it presents significant disadvantages, including prolonged placement time, increased risk of operator injury, and compromised oral hygiene. To address these challenges, alternative methods such as IMF screws and hybrid arch bars have been introduced. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy, advantages, disadvantages, and potential complications of three MMF techniques, IMF screws, hybrid arch bars, and Erich arch bars in the management of mandibular fractures. Study design: This study follows the Results: All 45 patients were included in the final analysis. Conclusion: and Relevance: This study highlights that IMF screws offer a

Indexed as

Arch barHybrid arch barIntermaxillary fixationIntermaxillary fixation screws

Identifiers

PMID40687861
PMCPMC12273417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.