ArticleTaxon2023
The challenges of classifying big genera such as
Article in Taxon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Taming the giant: towards a global sectional taxonomy for the big genus Artemisia.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Elucidation of Dual Antimicrobial and Anti-Parkinsonian Activities through an In-Silico Approach ofACS omega · 2026Article
- Integrative morphological, palynological, and phylogenomic evidence supports the recognition ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Global phylogeny and taxonomy of Artemisia.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Nomenclature for human and animal fungal pathogens and diseases: a proposal for standardized terminology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Review
- Intergeneric Comparison of Staminal Trichomes in the Tribe Ipomoeeae (Convolvulaceae).Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Twenty years of big plant genera.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- The research behind a taxonomic monograph: a case study fromKew bulletin · 2024Article
- ThePeerJ · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Big genera represent a significant proportion of the world's plants. However, comprehensive taxonomic and evolutionary studies of these genera are often complicated by their size and geographic spread. This paper explores the challenges faced in classifying these megadiverse plant groups consequent to the existing tension between diagnosability and increasing levels of resolution from molecular sequence data. We use recent examples from across angiosperms to illustrate how monophyly, diagnosability and completeness interplay with each other in attempts to classify several big genera and, specifically, the genus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.