ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Factors associated with decline in ambulatory ability following intramedullary nailing of 42A-C diaphyseal tibia fractures.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that were associated with a decline in functional ambulatory status following fractures of the tibial diaphysis. Methods: A retrospective review of an IRB-approved tibial diaphysis fracture database from 2012 to 2024 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18, isolated OTA 42A-C tibia fracture treated with an intramedullary nail, and minimum 12 months follow-up. Demographics, injury, and surgical information were collected. Functional ambulatory status was measured at routine follow up intervals by the Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC) score, a six-point scale where zero represents non-ambulation and five represents normal ambulatory ability. Univariate analysis was performed using Student's T-tests and Chi-squared tests. A backwards stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors that were independently associated with a decline in FAC score (SPSS version 29, Armonk, NY). Results: 289 patients, with a mean follow up time of 15.04 ± 6.18 months, were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43.24 ± 16.22 years, body mass index of 27.19 ± 6.30, and age-unadjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0.18 ± 0.54. 39.1 % of patients were female, 28.0 % patients sustained open fractures, and 52.6 % sustained high energy injuries. The logistic regression demonstrated that older age (OR = 1.04 p < .001), higher BMI (OR = 1.06 p = .024), high-energy mechanism (OR = 3.18 p = .003), nonunion (OR = 3.66, p = .005), and concomitant lower extremity fractures (OR = 4.47 p = 002), were risk factors for a decrease in final FAC score. The AUROC of the logistic regression equation was 0.787 indicating a moderate ability to discriminate between patients that will experience a loss in functional ambulatory ability and those who will not. Conclusion: This study suggests that concomitant lower extremity injuries, increased age, increased BMI, high-energy mechanisms, and nonunion are risk factors that are associated with a decline in ambulatory capacity following diaphyseal tibia fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.