Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687744›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative methods2024

Qualitative digital diary methods: participant-led values for ethical and insightful mental health research.

Catherine McCombie, Georgina Miguel Esponda, Hannah Ouazzane, Gemma Knowles, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson, Ulrike Schmidt, Vanessa Lawrence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine McCombieDepartment of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Georgina Miguel EspondaDepartment of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Hannah OuazzaneDepartment of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Gemma KnowlesDepartment of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Charlotte Gayer-AndersonDepartment of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Ulrike SchmidtSection of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Vanessa LawrenceDepartment of Health Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 17/123/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative digital diary methods are a promising tool for capturing participants' experiences in their own words and over time. The use of smartphone apps to collect this kind of data provides an accessible and flexible way to participate in research, but to truly benefit from this method, participants needs and preferences must be taken into account. This paper explores participants' experiences of taking part in qualitative digital diary research, and highlights participants' values and priorities for qualitative digital diary mental health research. Participants from two qualitative digital diary studies provided feedback on their experiences, in the form of interviews and focus groups, and data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The two participant groups, people with lived experience of eating disorders, and young people from diverse backgrounds across London schools, allowed exploration of experiences across different contexts and populations. The six resulting themes each reflect a core value that participants identified as an essential component for them in qualitative digital diary research: Self-expression, flexibility, non-judgement, open communication, helpful reflection, and meaningful impact. Themes each highlight aspects of participants' experiences that must be taken into account for future research to ensure that participants can take part in this type of research in ways that are meaningful to them, as well as most beneficial to the research. This paper provides an overview of participant experiences of qualitative digital diary research, and provides a framework for centring participant values and preferences in future qualitative diary research.

Indexed as

digital researchparticipant perspectivesqualitative diary methodsresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID40687744
PMCPMC7617831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.