ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
For-profit growth and academic decline: a retrospective nationwide assessment of Brazilian medical schools.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking Basic Science Teaching in Medical Education: A Viewpoint on Its Past, Present, and Future.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Factors associated with unsatisfactory ratings among medical courses in the 2025 Brazilian National Medical Education Assessment Exam: a cross-sectional study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Doctors in the making, or degrees for sale? A student's view of Brazil's medical education crisis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- From framework to fitness for the 21st century: How Brazil's 2025 National Curricular Guidelines recast priorities for training physicians.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Educational background of professionals managing health services in Brazil: insights from the national registry of specialization and certification course offerings.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Shaping Tomorrow's Doctors: The Impact of Socioeconomic and Institutional Factors on Medical Education Quality in Brazil: An Ecological Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rapid and predominantly for-profit expansion of medical schools in Brazil over the past decade has raised widespread concerns about the erosion of academic standards in medical education. Methods: This nationwide, retrospective study analyzed academic performance indicators from all Brazilian medical schools participating in the 2013, 2016, 2019, and 2023 cycles of the National Student Performance Exam ( Results: The number of for-profit medical schools in Brazil nearly doubled between 2013 and 2023. These institutions consistently demonstrated lower ENADE scores compared to public and non-profit peers. Although IDD scores showed some early gains, they declined significantly in 2023, particularly among new medical schools taking the ENADE for the first time, most of which were for-profit. Larger class sizes were negatively correlated with both ENADE and IDD scores. Regression models showed that public institutions outperformed for-profit schools by an average margin of more than 21 ENADE points, while class size emerged as a modest but statistically significant negative predictor of IDD. Conclusion: Our findings reveal that the unregulated expansion of for-profit medical schools in Brazil has been accompanied by a decline in academic performance, as measured by national benchmarks. These patterns suggest a structural misalignment between the commercial logic of expansion and the core educational mission of medical training. Regulatory reforms are urgently needed to realign the growth of medical education with principles of academic quality and social accountability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.