ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Intraocular lens calculation for cataract surgery in high myopia: a case report of an extreme axial eyeball length of 35.7 mm.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme axial eyeball length is a known risk factor for decreased accuracy of intraocular lens calculations. We report a case of a 35 years-old male with anisometropic amblyopia and an axial length of 35.7 mm in his right eye. To the best of our knowledge, this is a case of one of the longest eyeballs ever scientifically reported. The patient presented with presenile cataracts in the right eye, hand movement visual acuity, and required cataract surgery. Due to his high anisometropia, he was unable to wear spectacle correction prior to surgery in the amblyopic eye. The left (non-amblyopic) eye had moderate myopia and corrected to 20/20 with no signs of cataracts. Various intraocular lens (IOL) calculations were compared, aiming for a slight postoperative residual myopia in the right eye (approx. -1.50 D). The patient required a minus-power intraocular lens, and an IOL with a larger overall diameter (model 92S "Bigfoot IOL" manufactured by Morcher GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany) was selected. On the last available visit at 6 months, his refractive error was -1.50 to -0.75 D × 179° with a corrected visual acuity of 20/63. The large IOL was stable in the capsular bag, and there were no postoperative complications. The patient was able to wear spectacles with correction in both eyes and reported significant improvement in binocular vision and quality of life. Negative power IOLs typically have different optic configurations and require special considerations during IOL calculation. Care should be taken to avoid postoperative hyperopic refractive error. Nowadays, surgeons can choose from a selection of traditional formulas, newer-generation formulas, and axial length adjustment techniques to improve refractive predictability of eyes with extreme axial myopia. With this case report, we would like to demonstrate that even in rare cases of extreme, high myopia and eyeball length > 35 mm, good results can be achieved with correct IOL power implantation if certain considerations are made prior and during the procedure. Special considerations should be taken into account to maximize patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.