Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687681›Full record

ArticleJournal of open psychology data2024

Data from ManyDogs 1.

Manydogs Project, Julia Espinosa, Elizabeth Hare, Daniela Alberghina, Bryan Mitchel Perez Valverde, Jeffrey R Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of open psychology data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manydogs Project
Julia EspinosaDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0780-2762
Elizabeth HareDog Genetics LLC, Astoria, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3978-2543
Daniela AlberghinaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2826-0325
Bryan Mitchel Perez ValverdeThe Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0319-4608
Jeffrey R StevensDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain, Biology & Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2375-1360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ManyDogs 1 study is the first multi-site collaborative study of dogs' responses to human pointing. It addressed whether dogs perceive the gesture as socially communicative and are therefore more likely to follow the point when it is paired with additional social signals (ManyDogs Project, et al., 2023b). Researchers from 20 research sites across eight countries collected data from 704 dogs. Here, we present not only the behavior data on the dogs' responses to experimental pointing conditions but also guardian responses to survey questions, including the Canine Behavior and Research Questionnaire (C-BARQ, Hsu and Serpell, 2003). This dataset allows for assessing associations among C-BARQ measures as well as connections to the experimental task data, research site metadata, and other dog and guardian characteristic data.

Indexed as

CanineDogInterspecies interactionPointingSocial communication

Identifiers

PMID40687681
PMCPMC12270080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.