Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687674›Full record

ArticleJournal of open psychology data2024

Data on COVID-19-related Research Questions Spanning Diverse Disciplinary and National Contexts.

Katarina Blask, Débora B Maehler, Martin Kerwer

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of open psychology data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarina BlaskLeibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2062-4059
Débora B MaehlerGESIS -Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7043-8786
Martin KerwerLeibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0735-5165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The special collection "Data for Psychological Research on COVID-19" presents selected datasets collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. In selecting the data papers, care was taken to ensure that the described datasets not only represent the full range of psychological topics addressed during the pandemic but also reflect its global nature, in that diverse nationalities were included in the investigated samples. As these datasets are shared according to the FAIR Principles (Wilkinson et al., 2016), they are findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. The special collection comprises 12 data papers presenting quantitative studies on the impact of COVID-19 on various psychological constructs, including socio-political attitudes, beliefs in conspiracy theories, emotional reactions, and control behaviour.

Indexed as

conspiracy theoriesCOVID-19quantitative studiesresearch datasocio-political attitudes

Identifiers

PMID40687674
PMCPMC12270280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.