ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Understanding stakeholder relationships and local context to build a community-based one health surveillance system in Guinea.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2014, the Ebola virus epidemic that began in Guinea spread to several countries in sub-Saharan Africa, causing the deaths of almost 11,000 people. This crisis, caused in part by increased human contact with wildlife, was exacerbated by the lack of preparedness within the health sector of the affected countries, including inadequate surveillance of disease emergence from wildlife. Given that local communities face the greatest exposure to these issues, this study sought to acquire the contextual knowledge needed to set up community-based zoonotic disease surveillance. Field investigations based on a One Health approach were carried out at two sites in the Guéckédou prefecture in Guinea's forest region. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus group discussions were held with 87 members of the community. These interviews provided new information about zoonotic disease surveillance in Guinea, which we then used to map the health actors and their relationships within the community. We gathered details about the barriers they face and their concerns, such as the fundamental importance of training, a lack of legitimacy, and the differences in means allocated among the human, animal, environmental, health sectors. Some relatively unidentified stakeholders also emerged as possible communication channels. This study shows the importance of talking to the primary users of surveillance to ensure the acceptability and relevance of the surveillance system to the local community. Community members can clearly articulate their priority needs in a given context to ensure potential solutions align with those needs. The epidemiological context in Forest Guinea over the last 10 years makes this region an ideal laboratory for understanding how to tackle emerging infectious diseases in close cooperation with the people most affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.