ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Challenges in the surveillance and control of mosquito-borne diseases in Europe and United States. The perspective from public health experts.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An autonomous intelligent mosquito sentinel for field-deployed surveillance.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Not here yet, but one bite away: Risk for vector-borne zoonotic diseases.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity of mosquito-borne diseases and the necessity for cross-sector collaboration present significant challenges, requiring changes in laws, policies, and inter-agency agreements. In this qualitative study we purposively selected and interviewed public health managers from the European Union and United States involved in vector-borne disease surveillance and control and asked them about the barriers currently faced when engaging in their activities. The interviewees highlighted the differences in surveillance and control guidelines between the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention which reflect structural political differences between the European Union and United States. The lack of centralisation increases uncertainty in applying mosquito surveillance and control guidance. In addition, limited resources and modelling capabilities hinder effective surveillance and control. The public health agents recognised that community engagement and transparent communication are critical for gaining public support and to succeed in interventions, thus recognition of the values of these collaborations need to be accounted for in disease preparedness. Effective mosquito surveillance and control requires strong organisational bases, coordination among stakeholders, and sufficient resources, as advocate by one health frameworks. Addressing these challenges is urgent due to global trends like climate change and increased international travel, which may heighten the risk of mosquito-borne disease outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.