ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2025
Establishment of a clinically relevant beagle model for periprosthetic joint infection with 3D-printed prostheses and multimodal evaluation.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: From molecular insights to innovative implants in degenerative skeletal disorders.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses significant challenges to arthroplasty outcomes, necessitating translational animal models for pathogenesis studies and therapeutic development. This study aimed to establish a standardized Beagle PJI model by integrating species-specific 3D-printed femoral prostheses with quantitative bacterial inoculation, while evaluating the dose-dependent effects of Methods: Two titanium alloy prostheses were designed using CT-based anatomical data: BFP-C (canine-optimized) and BFP-H (human-derived). Prostheses underwent mechanical compression tests, finite element analysis (FEA) simulating postoperative and osseointegration phases, and Results: BFP-C exhibited superior biomechanical compatibility, with 12.3-fold higher yield strength (6836 ± 157 N vs. 553 ± 49 N) and 97 % reduction in bone strain (0.71 % vs. 20.32 %) compared to BFP-H. All inoculated groups developed PJI with dose-dependent severity: ultra-high-dose (10^8 CFU) groups displayed severe osteolysis (pull-out strength: 24 ± 8 N vs. 924 ± 45 N in controls), biofilm formation, and mobility impairment (74 % reduction in distance travelled, 2003 ± 276 cm vs. 7976 ± 333 cm in controls), whereas low-dose (250 CFU) groups established PJI with milder manifestations, evidenced by sinus tract formation, 55.1 % reduction in pull-out strength (406 ± 15 N vs. 924 ± 45 N in controls), and concordant radiological/histopathological signs of infection. Imaging examinations revealed differential osteolytic patterns corresponding to bacterial loads. Combined wound evaluation and microbiological analyses confirmed consistent infection establishment across all replicates. Conclusion: This Beagle PJI model successfully recapitulates clinical infection dynamics, emphasizing the critical role of species-specific prosthesis design and standardized bacterial quantification. The integrated multimodal evaluation system (imaging, biomechanical, and behavioural analyses) demonstrated both the reliability of the model and its sensitivity in detecting infection progression. Its modular design supports customization for studying biofilm-resistant implants or antibiotic delivery systems. These findings not only provide a critical tool for mechanistic PJI research but also establish a theoretical foundation for clinical translation, with the quantitative multimodal framework directly informing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Translational potential: Beyond serving as a preclinical platform for anti-infective therapies, the model provides actionable insights into optimizing human prosthetic biomechanics, such as reducing stress shielding through FEA-informed design principles. The 3D printing workflow further demonstrates rapid prototyping capabilities for patient-specific orthopaedic implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.