ArticleHealth science reports2025
Comparative Analysis of Preferences and Willingness to Pay for COVID-19 Vaccine Among Individuals With and Without Chronic Diseases: A Discrete Choice Experiment Approach.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Quality of Health Towards Resilience Community in Indonesia: A Resilience Policy Discourse.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Response to Letter to Editor-The Quality of Health Towards Resilience Community in Indonesia: A Resilience Policy Discourse.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been pivotal in the global battle against the pandemic. However, vaccine acceptance remains a critical determinant of their effectiveness. While numerous studies have explored factors influencing vaccine acceptance, there is a notable dearth of research regarding preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) among individuals with chronic diseases (ChD) who are at heightened risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This study addresses this gap by investigating COVID-19 vaccine preferences and WTP among individuals with and without chronic diseases. Methods: Employing a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach, we interviewed 843 participants to assess their preference for COVID-19 vaccine attributes such as origin, efficacy level, protection duration, and provider. We used a mixed logit model to analyze DCE data and estimated WTP by taking the negative ratio of preference and price parameters. Furthermore, we performed a stratified analysis according to the household head's ChD status. Results: As expected, vaccines with higher efficacy and longer protection are most preferred. Interestingly, our research shows a preference for European and American vaccines over Chinese vaccines. Additionally, this study reveals a preference for private facilities over government facilities for vaccinations among vaccine seekers. Patients with ChD exhibit higher WTP than those without such conditions, demonstrating the group's urgency in becoming vaccinated. Conclusion: Vaccine procurement and administration decisions by health authorities should be evidence-based and reflect public preferences regarding acceptance and WTP. Health authorities should prioritize both high efficacy and long-lasting protection in vaccine procurement, ensuring that neither is compromised. This approach addresses the top concerns of both groups-vaccine effectiveness for the ChD group and extended immunity for the NChD group. This study also informs policy decisions regarding vaccine origin and suggests incorporating private facilities as vaccine administration points to reduce pressure on government facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.