Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687472›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2025

Prevalence of IDH1/IDH2 Mutations in Adult Indian Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients and Their Impact on Outcome.

Poorvi Kapoor, Ruchi Gupta, Sanjeev Ayushi Kaushal, Nivedita Prabhakar Yeramilli, Khaliqur Rahman, Akhilesh Sharma, Ashish Mishra, Faheema Hassan, Dinesh Chandra, Manish K Singh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Poorvi KapoorDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Ruchi GuptaDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-9188
Sanjeev Ayushi KaushalDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Nivedita Prabhakar YeramilliDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Khaliqur RahmanDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Akhilesh SharmaDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Ashish MishraDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Faheema HassanDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Dinesh ChandraDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Manish K SinghDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.
Rajesh KashyapDepartment of Hematology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed at evaluating the prevalence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in Indian AML patients and ascertaining its impact on the treatment outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was carried out from 2019 to 2023, where 100 AML patients were tested for the presence of IDH mutations. The clinical and laboratory parameters of the patients were analysed and compared with an age matched control group of IDH1/2 negative AML patients. Treatment outcome was also compared between the groups and overall survival (OS) was calculated with subgroup analysis of intensive chemotherapy vs. Hypomethylating agent (HMA) and Venetoclax therapy in the IDH1/2 mutated group. A total of 26 (26%) patients tested positive for IDH mutations (19 for IDH1 and, 6 for IDH2, and one for both). Coexistence of IDH mutation with NPM1 mutation was observed in 7 patients (26.9%) while 3 patients (11.5%) showed positivity for FLT3 mutations. Sixteen patients opted for therapy at our centre; of which 62.5% received intensive chemotherapy and 37.5% received hypomethylating agents and venetoclax. Relapse was seen in 31.2% vs. 18.7% and mean OS was 1.6 years vs. 2.5 years in the IDHmut vs. the control arm. Overall mortality was 37.5% in IDHmut as compared to 25% in the control arm. The study thus higlights that IDHmut AML patients had a higher relapse and poorer survival outcome when compared to the IDH negative control group.

Indexed as

AMLIDH1/2 MutationIndiaOutcome

Identifiers

PMID40687472
PMCPMC12267756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.