Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687437›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Navigating the AI revolution: challenges and opportunities for integrating emerging technologies into knowledge management systems. Systematic literature review.

Teona Gelashvili-Luik, Peeter Vihma, Ingrid Pappel

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Teona Gelashvili-LuikDepartment of Software Science, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Peeter VihmaDepartment of Software Science, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Ingrid PappelRagnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming organizational knowledge management (KM) by leveraging techniques such as machine learning, neural networks, and fuzzy logic to enhance knowledge discovery, capture, storage, and sharing. While this shift promises improved efficiency and personalization, it also poses challenges related to data quality, employee resistance, and alignment with existing workflows. Methods: This study presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of 40 peer-reviewed publications focused on the integration of AI in KM. The review follows PRISMA guidelines and includes thematic coding to identify patterns, critical success factors, and knowledge gaps. Results: Findings indicate that successful AI-enabled KM depends on strong leadership commitment, adaptable governance structures, and context-sensitive technology selection. AI's role is evolving from supporting routine tasks to enabling dynamic, real-time knowledge flows. The review also highlights a critical need to balance automation with human oversight. Discussion: Key gaps were identified in understanding cost-benefit trade-offs, ethical implications, and governance mechanisms. These insights suggest directions for future research focused on practical, accountable, and empirically validated KM strategies. As part of an ongoing research project, the synthesized findings will inform the design of future empirical studies. The evidence suggests that, when strategically implemented, AI can serve as a competitive enabler in knowledge-driven organizations.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigital transformationemerging technologiesknowledge managementorganizational performance

Identifiers

PMID40687437
PMCPMC12271129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.