Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687375›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2025

Nonclinical strategies and considerations to enable the redosing of gene therapies.

Jeffrey S Moffit, Kathila R Alatsis, Diann L Blanset, Nicholas Buss, Payal Rana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey S MoffitCarbon Biosciences, Waltham, MA 02451, USA.
Kathila R AlatsisSpark Therapeutics, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Diann L BlansetBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, CT 06810, USA.
Nicholas BussEli Lilly, Boston, MA 02210, USA.
Payal RanaPfizer, Groton, CT 06340, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adeno-associated viral therapies offer the potential for many years of gene expression, yet some patients could benefit from subsequent doses to achieve or maintain an effective response. Reasons for inadequate or waning efficacy include immune response to the vector or transgene, insufficient dose for ideal therapeutic expression, and waning expression. Strategies to overcome these factors are needed to maximize the benefits of gene therapy through redosing of patients who did not fully benefit from a single dose. Maintenance dosing is also important to counteract any decrease in efficacy caused by cell turnover or disease progression. Current gene therapies administered systemically cannot be readministered due to an immune response against the delivery vector. The immune response can eliminate the vector from circulation, targeting transduced cells for removal and/or can lead to adverse immune reactions. However, new immune modifying techniques and emerging delivery platforms are being developed to overcome these limitations. Despite these advances, there is currently no regulatory guidance on how to design nonclinical studies to enable clinical redosing. This article provides an overview of potential therapeutic approaches to address redosing and proposes nonclinical strategies to support clinical development of gene therapies intended for repeated administration.

Indexed as

AAVgene therapyimmunogenicityimmunosuppressantsnonclinicalreadministrationredosingregulatorysafetytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID40687375
PMCPMC12275829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.