ArticleMethodsX2025
A comparative analysis of emotion recognition from EEG signals using temporal features and hyperparameter-tuned machine learning techniques.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subject Identity Confounds qEEG Emotion Recognition on DEAP and DREAMER.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Adaptive frequency band attention-guided CNN-BiLSTM for Spatial-Spectral-Temporal EEG emotion recognition.Brain informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classifying emotions based on EEG signals is really important for enhancing our interactions with computers, monitoring mental health and creating applications in affective computing field. This study explores improving emotion recognition performance by applying traditional machine learning classifiers and boosting techniques to EEG data from the DEAP dataset. To categorize emotional states, we used four classifiers: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost and Gradient Boosting. Differential entropy and Higuchi's fractal dimension are two important time-domain parameters that we extracted after applying a segmentation technique to capture the temporal interdependence of EEG data. These features were selected for their ability to reflect intricate neural dynamics associated with emotional processing. A five-fold cross-validation procedure was applied to estimate the model's performance and hyperparameter tuning was conducted to optimize classifier efficiency. XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy 89 % for valence and 88 % for arousal demonstrating its superior performance. Furthermore, cross-subject evaluation on the SEED dataset reinforced the approach's robustness, where XGBoost achieved 86 % accuracy using HFD and 84 % using DE. These results emphasize the effectiveness of combining advanced feature extraction methods with boosting algorithms for EEG-based emotion recognition, offering promising directions for the development of real-world emotion-aware systems. The key findings of this research are as follows:•Differential Entropy and Higuchi's Fractal Dimension proved effective in capturing emotional brain dynamics•XGBoost outperformed other classifiers in both DEAP and SEED datasets•The proposed method demonstrates robustness across subject variations and datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.