Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687354›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

A comparative analysis of emotion recognition from EEG signals using temporal features and hyperparameter-tuned machine learning techniques.

Rabita Hasan, Sheikh Md Rabiul Islam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rabita HasanDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering (ECE), Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna 9203, Bangladesh.
Sheikh Md Rabiul IslamDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering (ECE), Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna 9203, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classifying emotions based on EEG signals is really important for enhancing our interactions with computers, monitoring mental health and creating applications in affective computing field. This study explores improving emotion recognition performance by applying traditional machine learning classifiers and boosting techniques to EEG data from the DEAP dataset. To categorize emotional states, we used four classifiers: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost and Gradient Boosting. Differential entropy and Higuchi's fractal dimension are two important time-domain parameters that we extracted after applying a segmentation technique to capture the temporal interdependence of EEG data. These features were selected for their ability to reflect intricate neural dynamics associated with emotional processing. A five-fold cross-validation procedure was applied to estimate the model's performance and hyperparameter tuning was conducted to optimize classifier efficiency. XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy 89 % for valence and 88 % for arousal demonstrating its superior performance. Furthermore, cross-subject evaluation on the SEED dataset reinforced the approach's robustness, where XGBoost achieved 86 % accuracy using HFD and 84 % using DE. These results emphasize the effectiveness of combining advanced feature extraction methods with boosting algorithms for EEG-based emotion recognition, offering promising directions for the development of real-world emotion-aware systems. The key findings of this research are as follows:•Differential Entropy and Higuchi's Fractal Dimension proved effective in capturing emotional brain dynamics•XGBoost outperformed other classifiers in both DEAP and SEED datasets•The proposed method demonstrates robustness across subject variations and datasets.

Indexed as

Boosted EEG Emotion Classification Using Differential Entropy and Higuchi's Fractal DimensionDEAP datasetEEG signalsEmotion classificationFeature extractionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40687354
PMCPMC12272909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.