ArticleEJVES vascular forum2025
Sartorius and Gracilis Muscle Flaps as Adjuncts for the Management of Complicated Femoral Wounds in Vascular Surgery.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Re: Sartorius and Gracilis Muscle Flaps as Adjuncts to the Management of Complicated Femoral Wounds in Vascular Surgery.EJVES vascular forum · 2025Article
- Coverage Through Collaboration: Toward Evidence Based Flap Selection.EJVES vascular forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Groin complications following vascular surgery occur in 10-30% of cases and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. While various institutions have published results on sartorius and rectus femoris muscle flaps for arterial reconstruction coverage, there are limited data on the use of gracilis muscle flaps. This study aimed to present the outcomes of sartorius and gracilis muscle flaps in managing complicated femoral wounds. Method: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2019 to December 2023 at a tertiary centre in New Zealand. The study design followed the STrengthening the Reporting of Observation studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. Patients who underwent a muscle flap for an emergency vascular surgery indication were included. The primary outcome was wound healing, while secondary outcomes included re-intervention, limb and graft salvage. Results: Twenty-three flaps were performed for post-operative complications during the study period, including 10 gracilis flaps and 13 sartorius flaps, with a median follow up of twenty-six months. Complete healing was achieved in 90% of patients in the gracilis group, compared with 69% in the sartorius group ( Conclusion: Both gracilis and sartorius muscle flaps are viable options for reconstructing femoral wounds, with reasonable post-operative outcomes. Further multicentre studies are needed to better correlate clinical outcomes with the perceived benefits of the gracilis flap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.