Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687311›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2025

Psychosocial considerations in pediatric heart transplantation: Initial validation of the Pediatric Psychosocial Assessment Tool at a single center.

Michael O Killian, Sonnie E Mayewski, Schyler E Brumm, Zhe He, Dipankar Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael O KillianCollege of Social Work, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Sonnie E MayewskiCollege of Social Work, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Schyler E BrummCollege of Social Work, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Zhe HeCollege of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Dipankar GuptaCongenital Heart Center, UF Health Shands Children's Hospital, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
15/24- Healthy Brain and Child Development National ConsortiumU01DA055358 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GURKA, KELLY K., SCOTT, LISA S. · 2021 to 2023
$3.7M
Prediction of Health Outcomes and Adverse Events in Pediatric Organ Transplantation in FloridaR21LM013911 · NLM · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, ZHE, KILLIAN, MICHAEL · 2022 to 2023
$395k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA055358NLM NIH HHS R21 LM013911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pre-transplant psychosocial assessment, in conjunction with medical and surgical evaluation, is a critical component of determining pediatric heart transplant candidacy. Psychosocial factors such as family dynamics, health literacy, mental health, financial stability, and adherence potential are often multidimensional and interdependent, making their assessment both vital and complex. However, few standardized tools exist to guide these evaluations in pediatric heart transplant settings, and even fewer have demonstrated empirical validity or predictive value. To address this gap, the Pediatric Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PPAT) was developed to provide a structured, semi-quantitative framework for evaluating psychosocial risk in pediatric transplant candidates. Methods: This study presents initial validation data for the PPAT, based on 189 assessments conducted at a large pediatric heart transplant center. The tool evaluates nine psychosocial domains, assigns risk ratings, and yields a total risk score. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional structure of the tool, and internal consistency was strong (α = 0.89). Higher PPAT scores were significantly associated with lower odds of being listed for transplant by the center's multidisciplinary medical review board (MRB), even after accounting for clinical factors. Domain-level findings revealed financial and health literacy issues as commonly identified risk areas. Conclusion: The PPAT holds promise as a valid, reliable, and clinically useful instrument for guiding MRB discussions and targeting interventions to support high-risk families. Future directions include expanding implementation to other centers and integrating the PPAT into digital platforms using artificial intelligence and natural language processing to enhance efficiency, consistency, and patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Medical review boardPediatric heart transplantPre-transplant psychosocial assessmentPsychosocial risk

Identifiers

PMID40687311
PMCPMC12272104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.