ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
A proof-of-concept study of direct magnetic resonance imaging-based proton dose calculation for brain tumors via neural networks with Monte Carlo-comparable accuracy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Proton therapy currently relies on computed tomography (CT) imaging despite magnetic resonance imaging's (MRI) superior soft-tissue contrast. While synthetic CTs can be generated from magnetic resonance (MR) images, this introduces additional complexity. We present a deep learning-based dose engine enabling direct proton dose calculation from MR images to streamline workflows while maintaining Monte Carlo (MC)-level accuracy. Materials and methods: Using paired MR-CT scans from 39 brain tumor patients (29/3/7 for training/validation/testing), we developed a deep learning framework using various sequence models for individual proton pencil beam dose prediction. The framework processes beam-eye-view patches from 2000 random beam configurations per patient, varying in angles and energy, with corresponding MC dose distributions pre-calculated on CT. Models using CT images were trained for comparison. Results: The xLSTM architecture performed best for both MR and CT-based scenarios among the evaluated sequence models. For full treatment plans, our model achieved gamma pass rates with median 99.8 % (range: 98.6 %-99.9 %, 1 mm/1%), and median percentage dose errors of 0.2 % (range: 0.1 %-0.4 %) within patient bodies and 1.3 % (range: 0.8 %-3.7 %) in high-dose regions (>90 % prescription dose). The model required only 3 ms per beam prediction compared to 2 s for MC simulation. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of MC-quality proton dose calculations directly from MR images for brain tumor patients, achieving comparable accuracy with faster computation and simplified implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.