Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687293›Full record

ReviewJournal of hand and microsurgery2025

Preoperative cardiac evaluation in elective non-cardiac surgery in India: Routine ECG, echocardiography, and angiography are not mandatory.

Narayanee Rajasekaran, Shivanand S Patil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Narayanee RajasekaranSri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, India.
Shivanand S PatilSri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preoperative cardiac testing aims to identify patients at risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications, but indiscriminate use of tests like electrocardiograms (ECGs), echocardiography (ECHO), and even coronary angiography in low-risk patients often provides little benefit. International guidelines (2024 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 2022 European Society of Cardiology) now emphasize a selective, risk-based approach rather than routine screening. In India, clinicians face pressure - including medicolegal concerns - to order extensive preoperative investigations. This article provides an evidence-based framework, from an Indian perspective, to guide when preoperative ECG, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), or angiographic evaluation are truly warranted for elective non-cardiac surgeries, strongly emphasizing that these tests are Methods: A narrative review was conducted, synthesizing recommendations from the 2024 ACC/AHA Guideline for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and the 2022 ESC Guideline on non-cardiac surgery, along with key studies and Indian practice insights. We focused on guideline-directed indications for preoperative ECG and ECHO, highlighting Class III recommendations (tests not recommended) versus scenarios where testing is appropriate. Evidence from randomized trials (e.g., CARP trial) and observational cohorts was reviewed to assess outcome impact of routine testing. Consideration was given to India-specific factors such as higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease and defensive medical practices. The findings were distilled into a decision algorithm and summary tables stratified by surgical risk and patient factors. Results: Routine preoperative ECG or ECHO in asymptomatic patients undergoing low-risk surgery (expected <1 % 30-day Major Adverse Cardiac event risk) is not recommended (Class III, no benefit). The 2022 ESC guidelines do not recommend ECG even for intermediate risk surgeries in those who are asymptomatic and do not have pre existing heart disease (Class III). Unnecessary testing in low-risk situations did not improve outcomes and can lead to delays. For intermediate- or high-risk surgeries, a baseline ECG is reasonable, especially in patients with known cardiovascular disease (ACC/AHA Class IIa; ESC Class I). However, even for intermediate risk surgeries, an ECG is Conclusion: Not all patients require extensive cardiac work-up before surgery. An evidence-based, selective strategy can safely optimize care: preoperative ECG and ECHO are performed only when clinical indicators suggest necessity, rather than as routine for every case. This approach is supported by current guidelines and outcome studies and maximizes patient safety and resource utilization. In the Indian medicolegal context, adhering to such guideline-driven protocols establishes a clear standard of care, protecting clinicians who avoid unnecessary tests. By documenting rationale for selective testing (or omission of testing) per accepted guidelines, doctors can shield themselves from medicolegal accusations, while focusing on truly at-risk patients. Ultimately, a targeted preoperative cardiac evaluation strategy ensures high-value care - doing the right test for the right patient - and prevents over-testing that is not mandatory for low-risk scenarios.

Indexed as

ACC/AHA guidelinesCardiac risk assessmentDefensive medicineEchocardiography (ECHO)Electrocardiography (ECG)ESC guidelinesIndiaMedicolegal considerationsNoncardiac surgeryPreoperative evaluationSurgical risk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40687293
PMCPMC12270625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.