ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Excessive or reduced rest-day sleep compensation linked to depression in Chinese adults.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing happiness and life satisfaction in university students: analysis with a machine learning approach.BMC psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to evaluate the impact of Rest Day Catch-up Sleep (RDCS) patterns on depression among Chinese adults during the pandemic and to explore the relationship between different levels of compensation and the likelihood of depression. Methods: This study included 3,981 participants, who were divided into five groups based on changes in rest day sleep duration: no change in sleep duration (RDCS = 0 h), reduced sleep duration (RDCS < 0), moderate catch-up sleep (1 h < RDCS < 2 h), and long catch-up sleep (RDCS ≥ 2 h). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationship between RDCS and depression. Stratified logistic regression and interaction effect analyses were conducted to explore demographic differences in the association between RDCS and depression. Results: In the fully adjusted model, participants with reduced sleep duration had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.12 (95%CI [1.31 - 3.46]) for depression, while those with long catch-up sleep had an OR of 1.60 (95%CI [1.29 - 1.98]). Stratified logistic regression and interaction effect analyses indicated that the association between RDCS < 0 h and depression was more significant among individuals with a Body Mass Index (BMI) < 25 kg/m², while the association between RDCS ≥ 2 h and depression was more significant among individuals with a general self-rated health status. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that both reduced sleep duration and excessive catch-up sleep during the pandemic are associated with an increased likelihood of depression. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining stable sleep patterns during special periods and provide scientific evidence for the development of targeted public health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.