Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40687239›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

Systemic immune response induced by radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation at varying powers in murine models of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Xudong Qi, Zewen Zhu, Frank Tacke, Ming Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xudong QiDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Zewen ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Frank TackeDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Ming YinDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Thermal ablation for orthotopic tumors can activate the immune system, eliciting tumor-specific immune responses. With the recognition of the immune system's role in cancer outcomes and the demand for effective immunotherapies, there is a clinical need to optimize ablation techniques to enhance anti-tumor immunity. This study evaluates the effects of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) at varying powers and durations on systemic T cell profiles and cytokine levels. Methods: Subcutaneous murine hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) models were established. A total of 50 mice were randomly allocated into five groups, with 10 mice in each group: high-power MWA (10 W, 30 s), low-power MWA (5 W, 60 s), high-power RFA (10 W, 30 s), low-power RFA (5 W, 60 s), and untreated control group. Peripheral CD3 Results: High-power (10 W) ablation boosted adaptive immunity on day 14 post-procedure, manifested as significantly elevated CD3 Conclusions: High-power MWA and RFA can notably activate systemic immunity and enhance Th1 response. These findings underscore the potential of optimizing ablation parameters (such as higher power and shorter duration) to amplify anti-tumor immunity, bridging local tumor control with systemic immune activation.

Indexed as

cytokinesHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)microwave ablation (MWA)radiofrequency ablation (RFA)T cells

Identifiers

PMID40687239
PMCPMC12268891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.