ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic impact of Fusobacterium nucleatum in head and neck cancers: a meta-analysis of critical oncological outcomes.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Decoding Occult Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From AI-Driven Multimodal Fusion to Clinical Translation.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Tumor microenvironment-derived IL-32 promotes aggressive phenotypes and stem cell traits in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a common malignancy with high rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM), which significantly impacts prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the potential utility of Methods: Clinical information, tissue, and plasma samples were collected from a cohort of 254 HNSCC patients. IL-32 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC), while fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to evaluate Results: IL-32 levels were higher in tumor tissue compared to paracancer tissue (P<0.001). Patients with high F. nucleatum enrichment had higher IL-32 expression (P=0.04). Through univariate and multivariate analyses, alcohol, Ki-67 (antigen Kiel-67) expression, Conclusions: The enrichment of F. nucleatum in cancer tissue is positively correlated with high expression of IL-32, suggesting that these two novel indicators,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.