ArticleInternet interventions2025
User engagement in a digital health intervention designed for young people who have experienced technology-assisted sexual abuse (i-Minds trial).
Article in Internet interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience in young people who have experienced technology-assisted sexual abuse: a feasibility clinical trial.Child and adolescent mental health · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Technology-assisted sexual abuse (TASA) mostly involves the production and non-consensual sharing of sexual images; however, evidence-based support for young people (YP) who have experienced TASA is scant. Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) have the potential to increase access to support and provide timely therapeutic input in a familiar format to YP. However, studies describing engagement with DHIs is nascent. Our objective is to describe engagement patterns for YP people who used the i-Minds app. Methods: The i-Minds app is a co-designed mentalisation-based DHI for YP who have experienced TASA. Usage data was collected during the 6-week intervention window using Matomo analytics software and analysed according to the AMUsED framework. Results: Forty-one participants were onboarded to the app. Of these, 95 % completed the introductory mandatory module, and nearly half completed the remaining three modules. Median duration of app engagement was 33 days. Most participants used the app on weekdays in the afternoon. Demographic variables, namely gender not matching with sex assigned at birth/prefer not to disclose and higher baseline clinical severity were associated with higher app engagement. Conclusions: Participants showed high module completeness and engagement duration, suggesting the potential for real-world use. Potential participant-level predictors of engagement, such as gender identity and severity of TASA related traumatic stress and emotional distress, were identified. Achieving satisfactory engagement in DHIs is challenging yet necessary for delivering effective interventions. Future studies should explore participant-level predictors of engagement to inform real-world use of DHIs with a diverse sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.