ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2025
Evaluation of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance system in Kebbi State, Nigeria between 2013-2018.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: since 1988, polio incidence has declined by over 99% globally, from more than 350,000 annual cases in over 125 endemic countries to transmission now limited to Pakistan and Afghanistan. Africa has not reported wild poliovirus since 2016. An effective Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance system is crucial for detecting and interrupting polio transmission. This evaluation assessed the Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance system in Kebbi State, Nigeria, to identify operational gaps. Methods: using updated Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and the World Health Organization (WHO) performance standards, the study reviewed AFP surveillance data from 2013-2018, conducted stakeholder interviews using adapted questionnaires and key informant interviews, and analyzed data using means, frequencies, and proportions. Results: among the 49 respondents, 98% reported that case definitions and investigation forms were easy to use, while 97% found data tools adaptable to changes. All surveillance officers understood AFP case definitions and expressed willingness to sustain the system. Key performance indicators, including non-polio AFP rates (24.6-55.2), stool adequacy (95-99.7%), timeliness, and reporting completeness all consistently met WHO standards. Conclusion: the evaluation concluded that the AFP surveillance system in Kebbi State, Nigeria, is useful, simple, flexible, acceptable, sensitive, representative, timely, and stable, although donor dependency remains a concern. A significant gap was the lack of data on 60-day follow-ups and laboratory feedback. Addressing these issues is important to further strengthen the system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.