Data for Psychological Research in the Educational Field: Spotlights, Data Infrastructures, and Findings from Research.

Sonja Bayer, Katarina Blask, Timo Gnambs, Malte Jansen, Débora B Maehler, Alexia Meyermann, Claudia Neuendorf

Abstract readEditorial

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of open psychology data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sonja BayerDIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6851-1590

Katarina BlaskLeibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2062-4059

Timo GnambsLeibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6984-1276

Malte JansenInstitute for Educational Quality Improvement (IQB), DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7081-6505

Débora B MaehlerLeibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7043-8786

Alexia MeyermannDIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8960-2598

Claudia NeuendorfUniversity of Potsdam, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3024-0000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on the importance of open data and data sharing in scientific research (Nosek et al., 2015; van der Zee & Reich, 2018). However, in the educational field, access to FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) data remains a significant challenge (Wilkinson et al., 2016). This special collection addresses this challenge by highlighting psychological data in educational research and showcasing examples of data that have been shared and made available to the scientific community in accordance with FAIR principles. With this special collection, we aim to explicitly encourage the use of shared research data for individual research projects.

Indexed as

Data Reuse ChallengesPsychological Educational ResearchResearch Data CenterResearch Data Infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID40687104

DOI10.5334/jopd.105

PMCPMC12270083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.