Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686921›Full record

ReviewMedComm2025

Astrocyte in Neurological Disease: Pathogenesis and Therapy.

Meihui Huang, Aoyang Long, Lingjia Hao, Zilin Shi, Mengqi Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Supercritical CONutrients · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meihui HuangDepartment of Neurology Xiangya Hospital, Central South University Changsha Hunan China.
Aoyang LongDepartment of Neurology Xiangya Hospital, Central South University Changsha Hunan China.
Lingjia HaoDepartment of Neurology Xiangya Hospital, Central South University Changsha Hunan China.
Zilin ShiDepartment of Neurology Xiangya Hospital, Central South University Changsha Hunan China.
Mengqi ZhangDepartment of Neurology Xiangya Hospital, Central South University Changsha Hunan China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes, as key support cells in the central nervous system, maintain homeostasis in the brain through mechanisms such as ionic homeostasis regulation, metabolic support, synaptic modulation, and neuroinflammatory regulation. Recent studies have shown that astrocyte dysfunction is closely related to the pathologic processes of various neurological diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and stroke. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the dual roles of astrocytes in neurological diseases: on one hand, their aberrant activation can exacerbate disease progression by mediating neuroinflammation, synaptic dysfunction, and blood-brain barrier disruption; on the other hand, their metabolic disorders, such as lipid droplet accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress imbalance, further drive neurodegeneration. In terms of therapeutic strategies, interventions targeting astrocytes, such as modulation of activation phenotype, metabolic reprogramming, gene therapy, and innovative therapies based on exosomes and nanotechnology, show great promise. In the future, we may integrate multi-omics technologies and deepen clinical translational research to systematically analyze the spatial heterogeneity of astrocytes and their dynamic regulatory networks at different stages of the disease, in order to elucidate the precise mechanisms of their roles in the pathological process, and thus provide multidimensional theoretical support for the design of targeted therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

astrocyteblood–brain barrier dysfunctionmetabolic reprogrammingneuroinflammationneurological diseaseTherapeutic strategies

Identifiers

PMID40686921
PMCPMC12271643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.