ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2024
Xyla-P Cream vs. Lidocaine Spray: Impact on Patient Satisfaction, Anxiety, Cooperation, and Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One of the fundamental principles of medical interventions is to avoid causing pain to patients, and childbirth is no exception. With the rising prevalence of cesarean sections, addressing factors that may diminish maternal satisfaction is crucial. Spinal anesthesia, the most common method for cesarean sections, faces challenges such as patient anxiety. To mitigate pain associated with needle insertion, various methods, including lidocaine spray and Xyla-P cream, have been recommended. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine spray and Xyla-P cream in reducing pain during needle insertion for spinal anesthesia in cesarean sections. Methods: This randomized, placebo-controlled interventional study included 263 pregnant women at 37 weeks or more of gestational age who were candidates for elective cesarean sections. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups using a block permutation technique. In intervention group 1, 10 g of Xyla-P cream was applied 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia. In intervention group 2, three puffs of 10% lidocaine spray were used. The control group received three puffs of water spray ten minutes before anesthesia. Pain intensity and anxiety were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and maternal cooperation was scored by the anesthesiologist. Results: The mean age of the participants was 30 years, and 21% had no prior history of cesarean section. There was no significant difference in pain, anxiety, satisfaction, and cooperation between the Xyla-P and lidocaine groups. However, in the group receiving lidocaine, satisfaction (P-value: 0.001) and cooperation (P-value: 0.019) improved significantly compared to the placebo group, whereas anxiety increased significantly compared to the placebo group (P-value: 0.045). Conclusions: Lidocaine had a positive effect on maternal satisfaction with spinal anesthesia and, compared to the placebo, led to significant improvements in maternal satisfaction and cooperation. In light of these findings, lidocaine emerges as a more appropriate choice than Xyla-P cream.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.