ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Exploring #HealthLiteracy on LinkedIn: a first look at health hashtag engagement in a professional social media context.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
LinkedIn, despite its large and professionally credentialed user base, remains an underexplored platform for digital health communication, unlike X (formerly Twitter), which has been widely studied for health-related hashtag trends. Health literacy, a key determinant of public health, is increasingly promoted through social media hashtags such as #HealthLiteracy. However, to date, no studies have systematically examined how this hashtag is used on LinkedIn. This study aimed to analyze the use of #HealthLiteracy on LinkedIn, identify thematic patterns in post content, and evaluate user engagement trends, with comparisons to prior X-based research. A one-week retrospective dataset of #HealthLiteracy posts was collected using the SingleFile browser extension. The content was cleaned and analyzed using RStudio with standard text mining packages. Word frequencies, co-occurring hashtags, and engagement metrics (likes, comments, reposts) were extracted, and a chi-square goodness-of-fit test was performed to assess engagement distribution. A total of 370 posts with 3,174 engagements were analyzed. The most frequent co-occurring hashtags included #agedcare, #residentialagedcare, and #healthquality, indicating a focus on institutional eldercare. The most common words, care, aged, solutions, and transition reinforced this thematic alignment. Engagement was primarily passive, with reactions far outnumbering comments and reposts. This study establishes a proof-of-concept for LinkedIn-based hashtag analysis in health research. LinkedIn demonstrates strong potential for targeted dissemination of health literacy content to professionals and policymakers, although engagement strategies may need to be tailored to the platform's predominantly passive interaction culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.