Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686786›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2025

Optimising rhinoplasty outcomes in patients with thick skin.

Catrin Wigley, Jonathan Sutton, Nicholas Eynon-Lewis, Rajan Uppal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catrin WigleyRoyal Free Hospitals, London, UK.
Jonathan SuttonPortsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Nicholas Eynon-LewisWeymouth Street Hospital, London, UK.
Rajan UppalWeymouth Street Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Performing rhinoplasty in patients with a thick skin often presents as a challenge. This article describes an assessment tool to (1) classify patients according to the Methods: 166 patients underwent open rhinoplasty and were graded according to the Nasal Skin Thickness Scale (NSTS). Those patients graded as having thicker skin were selected for an acid peel before surgery. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) score were collected to assess outcomes as these are a validated patient reported outcome measure. Pearson chi-square test was used to determine statistically significance of the postoperative groups. Results: All patients with thick skin (grade 3) or above were offered a preoperative skin acid peel. A total of 42 patients received this peel. There was a mean improvement of 6.4 of the nose outcomes in patients who had Conclusions: This nasal skin thickness scale provides a simple framework for classifying nasal skin thickness. Skin thickness helps us identify patients who would benefit from optimisation of their skin before surgery to get the best results. In this case optimisation of the skin was undertaken with chemical peels. The acid peel helped shrink the skin and improve outcomes after rhinoplasty. This classification helps select patients who have thick skin and can be warned about swelling, lack of definition and the possible need for preconditioning.

Indexed as

Chemical peelCosmetic surgeryRhinoplastySkin thickness

Identifiers

PMID40686786
PMCPMC12275857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.