Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686759›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Efficacy of Vacuum-assisted Wound Closure in Improving Healing in Breast Surgery Patients: AReview.

Alexa Clark, James Sherrer, Karina Grover, Orr Shauly, Daniel J Gould, Albert Losken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexa ClarkFrom the Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
James SherrerFrom the Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Karina GroverDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Orr ShaulyDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Daniel J GouldPrivate Practice, Gould Plastic Surgery, Beverly Hills, CA.
Albert LoskenDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to facilitate complex wound closure, decrease healing complications, and improve scar quality. Recently, its application in closed incision wound healing has been studied. Although relatively new to plastic surgery, outcomes and complication rates of NPWT compared with conventional dressings following breast surgery have been increasingly studied. The purpose of this study is to review the literature to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT over standard-of-care closure in breast reconstruction and aesthetic surgery. Methods: A PubMed search was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to assess the use of NPWT in women 18 years or older who received breast reconstruction, augmentation, or reduction surgery. After abstract, full-text, and reference review, 13 articles were evaluated, and postoperative complications, such as seroma, hematoma, and infection incidence, were extracted. Results: Of the 10 articles that reported overall complication rates, 6 showed significant decreases in complications for breasts treated with an NPWT approach. All types of breast surgery and wound vacuum brands were used within these 6 studies. Patients who underwent breast reduction did not show a significant rise in hematoma or seroma formation with the use of NPWT. However, 2 studies reported a notable increase in seroma formation following breast reconstruction and augmentation surgery. There was no significant difference in infection rates between control and NPWT groups. Three studies primarily reporting bilateral breast reduction outcomes found a significantly decreased rate of wound dehiscence postoperatively compared with the standard dressing. Conclusions: NPWT is a promising alternative to standard-of-care dressings for mitigating postoperative wound healing complications in breast reconstruction, augmentation, and reduction. Limitations of this review include the lack of statistical comparison due to the small number of available studies and the minimal consistency of primary outcomes reported within breast surgery research. Even so, NPWT demonstrates an overall decrease in complications and provides a novel approach to enhancing cosmesis and healing of breast incisions postoperatively.

Identifiers

PMID40686759
PMCPMC12273643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.