ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Computed Tomography Angiography and 3-dimensional Reconstruction in Cervicofacial Burn Scar Flap Reconstruction.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Computed Tomography Angiography and 3-dimensional Reconstruction in Cervicofacial Burn Scar Flap Reconstruction: Erratum.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the impact of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction on the outcomes of repairing cervicofacial burn scars using expanded extra-long fasciocutaneous flaps. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 64 patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 32) receiving CTA and 3D reconstruction for preoperative planning, and a control group (n = 32) without these imaging modalities. Primary outcomes included flap survival rate, postoperative complications, aesthetic outcomes, and functional restoration. In this study, we assessed inflammatory variables to evaluate postoperative inflammatory responses and oxidative stress management. We measured serum levels of interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and vascular endothelial growth factor using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, we evaluated oxidative stress markers, malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a higher flap survival rate (93.75% versus 84.38%, Conclusions: The integration of CTA and 3D reconstruction in the repair of cervicofacial burn scars offers significant advantages, including improved preoperative planning, increased flap survival rates, and superior aesthetic and functional outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.