ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Evaluating leflunomide and methotrexate combination vs. monotherapy in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic potential of Boswellia serrata in arthritis management: mechanistic insights into COX-2, 5-LOX, and NFĸB modulation.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- Letter to the editor regarding "Kara M, Alp G, Pekdiker M, Ketenci S, Porreca A et al. Evaluating leflunomide and methotrexate combination vs. monotherapy in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences: 2025; 55 (3): 632-643".Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) are conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) commonly used for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), either as monotherapies or in combination. This study aimed to compare the adverse effects (AEs) and efficacy of combined use of MTX plus LEF with monotherapy in RA and PsA patients. Materials and methods: This study included 528 patients (385 RA and 143 PsA) with at least 6 months of follow-up. Disease activity was assessed using DAS-28 CRP and DAPSA, and treatment-related AEs were classified based on specific MedDRA categories. Results: The cumulative incidence of AEs in patients with RA treated with MTX, LEF, and MTX plus LEF was 23.8%, 28.2%, and 19.2%, respectively; in PsA patients, 18.1%, 30%, and 23.3%, respectively. None of the groups were superior to each other in terms of general AEs between monotherapy and in combination. LEF monotherapy in RA was associated with more neurological AEs and hypertension. Compared to monotherapy, MTX plus LEF demonstrated greater reductions in disease activity, a more substantial decrease in glucocorticoid doses, and lower utilization of biological/targeted DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in both RA and PsA. In univariate analysis, MTX dosage, initial DAS28 CRP, and b/tsDMARD initiation were predictors of low disease activity (LDA) in RA. In multivariate analysis, MTX dosage (95% CI 1.02-1.59, OR = 1.27, p = 0.031) and initial DAS28-CRP (95% CI 2.14-10.90, OR = 4.38, p < 0.001) were found to be independently associated with LDA in RA. In PsA, the factors associated with LDA were initial DAPSA and disease duration in univariate analysis. Only disease duration was found to be an independent predictor in multivariate analysis (95% CI, 1.02-1.38, OR = 1.17 p = 0.039). Conclusion: Adding LEF to MTX or vice versa may serve as a valuable, safe, and effective alternative in situations where b/tsDMARD therapy is challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.