SynthesisTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Janus kinase inhibitors in localized scleroderma: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tofacitinib treatment in a girl with localized scleroderma of the head and face: a case-based review.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- Successful Treatment of Localized Scleroderma in Intertriginous Areas with Tofacitinib: A Case Report.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- The Th17/Treg axis: a key to understanding and treating autoimmune disorders.Open life sciences · 2026Article
- Management and Clinical Outcomes of Scleredema Diabeticorum: A Scoping Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Reports on the use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of localized scleroderma are increasing in the literature. In this review, we examined the published studies regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in patients with localized scleroderma. Materials and methods: We searched MEDLINE and Scopus for articles on patients with localized scleroderma treated with JAK inhibitors. The search included articles from the inception of these databases through August 1 Results: Our literature search showed 11 articles describing 17 patients with localized scleroderma treated with JAK inhibitors. Generalized morphea (47.1%) was the most common type of localized scleroderma in patients treated with JAK inhibitors. The most frequently used JAK inhibitor was tofacitinib (64.7%). In some cases, baricitinib (17.6%) and ruxolitinib (17.6%) were also preferred. All JAK inhibitors were mainly preferred for the treatment of resistant/progressive skin disease in these patients (60.7%). The improvement rate associated with JAK inhibitors was 88.2%. Relapse occurred in 33.3% of patients treated with JAK inhibitors. Side effects were reported in 18.2% of patients: one patient was diagnosed to have diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 1) while on tofacitinib. Conclusion: JAK inhibitors could be considered as a therapeutic option, especially in patients with refractory localized scleroderma, but more extensive clinical trials are needed to clarify questions regarding their efficacy and safety data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.