ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Diagnosis of knee joint invasion in patients with osteosarcoma: the value of direct and indirect MRI findings.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in adolescents, and the evaluation of joint invasion with MRI is important for treatment planning. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of MRI findings (direct and indirect) for joint invasion in patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma of the knee region. Materials and methods: The MRI evaluations of 50 knee osteosarcoma patients who underwent surgical resection between 2006 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively by two radiologists and an orthopedic oncologist. The presence of intrasynovial tumor tissue, intra-articular destruction of cartilage or bone, and invasion of the capsular and cruciate ligament insertions were evaluated as direct findings in the diagnosis of joint invasion on MRI. Indirect findings included tumor size, adjacent epiphyseal bone signal changes- bone marrow infiltration and edema, synovial contrast enhancement, and joint effusion. These findings were scored separately on a 5-point Likert scale and statistically compared with histopathologic results. Results: The mean age of the patients was 22 years and the gender distribution was 21 females and 29 males. The best predictors for joint invasion were direct visualization of capsular insertion invasion (p < 0.05) and destruction of intraarticular bone (p < 0.05). MRI findings with statistically significant sensitivity and specificity: intrasynovial tumor tissue specificity 76%, sensitivity 58%; intra-articular cartilage destruction specificity 84%, sensitivity 56%; intra-articular bone destruction sensitivity 84%, specificity 48%; capsular insertion invasion sensitivity 92%, specificity 48%. Synovial effusion and contrast enhancement were the most sensitive indirect signs but lacked specificity. Conclusion: Joint invasion by osteosarcoma can reliably be assessed on preoperative MR images with high sensitivity and specificity. Particularly direct visualization of intrasynovial tumor tissue, capsular insertion invasion, and destruction of intraarticular bone and cartilage, a combination of highly specific direct signs was valuable, while indirect signs were less predictive and specific.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.