ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Medicolegal evaluation of pediatric patients with injection neuropathy.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Injection‑induced sciatic nerve injuries in Turkey: a public health and patient safety analysis of Supreme Court decisions.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Injection neuropathy (IN) is a rare but preventable form of iatrogenic nerve injury, particularly affecting the sciatic nerve when intramuscular injections are administered incorrectly. While IN is uncommon in high-income countries, it remains a significant public health issue in Türkiye, especially in pediatric populations. The aim of this study is to evaluate pediatric IN cases referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine and highlight medicolegal aspects to inform clinical and legal preventive strategies. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 67 pediatric cases (age range: 1-17 years; mean age: 10.5 years; 57 boys, 10 girls) referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine between January 01/01/2015 and January 01/01/2023, due to suspected injection-related sciatic neuropathy. Demographic data, clinical findings, suspected drugs, injection sites, and medicolegal conclusions were reviewed using descriptive statistics. Results: Sciatic nerve involvement was confirmed in 64 cases. The most frequently implicated drug was diclofenac sodium (n = 38), followed by sulbactam-ampicillin and clindamycin. In 59 cases, complications were identified; 2 cases were classified as malpractice due to incorrect site or technique. Six cases could not be evaluated due to insufficient medical documentation. Conclusion: Intramuscular injections, especially in pediatric patients, should not be considered routine procedures. Given the potential for severe complications, oral alternatives should be prioritized. When unavoidable, injections must be performed by qualified professionals considering patient age, muscle mass, and anatomical safety. This study underscores the medicolegal importance of accurate technique and documentation to prevent lifelong disability and litigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.