ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Efficacy and safety of narlumosbart, an anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phased II study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05278338 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo/Positive-controlled Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JMT103 in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo/Positive-controlled Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JMT103 in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to preliminarily explore the efficacy and safety of narlumosbart, an anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody, in treating postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods: This multi-center, randomized, double -blind, placebo- and active-controlled study was conducted at 23 clinics across China between April 21, 2022 and April 19, 2023. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive either 45 mg. 60 mg, 90 mg of narlumosbart, 60 mg of denosumab, or placebo, administered once every 6 months over a 12-month period, with the treatment allocation masked for participants, sponsors, and clinical investigators. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to 12 months. The secondary measures were percentage changes in lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMD, height changes, bone turnover markers, safety, and immunogenicity. Study registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05278338). Findings: 207 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled and randomly assigned to received narlumosbart 45-90 mg (n = 41 in each group), denosumab (n = 42), or placebo (n = 42). At month 12, patients receiving narlumosbart 45 mg, 60 mg, and 90 mg had the percentage change in lumbar spine BMD from baseline (least-squares [LS] mean [standard error]) of 4.83% (0.65), 6.52% (0.62), and 5.74% (0.64), respectively, and all showed significant increases compared with the placebo group (0.63% [0.67]), with LS mean differences (99% confidence interval [CI]) of 4.20% (1.92∼6.48), 5.90% (3.63∼8.16), and 5.11% (2.84∼7.39), respectively (all P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 91.9% of patients in the pooled narlumosbart groups, and 92.9% in both the placebo and the denosumab groups. Most common TEAEs were decreased vitamin D levels (34.1% [pooled narlumosbart] vs. 35.7% [placebo] vs. 33.3% [denosumab]), COVID-19 (38.2% vs. 40.5% vs. 35.7%), and increased serum parathyroid hormone (22.8% vs. 14.3% vs. 19.0%). Interpretation: In this phase II trial of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, narlumosbart demonstrated superiority over placebo in increasing BMD at 12 months following administration at 6-month intervals, with a tolerable safety profile in the short term, consistent with that of anti-RANKL monoclonal antibodies. Funding: This study was supported by Shanghai JMT-Bio Technology Co., Ltd.; National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFC2501700]; CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [2021-I2M-1-002]; National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding [2022-PUMCH-D-006]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [No. 82270938, No. 81970757]; and the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2023-PT320-10].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.