Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686659›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2025

Patient Perceptions Regarding Clinical Follow-Up After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Jeremy S Frederick, Samuel D Mounce, Jeffrey A Chapek, Caitlin E Conley, Stephen T Duncan, David C Landy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeremy S FrederickDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Samuel D MounceDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jeffrey A ChapekDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Caitlin E ConleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Stephen T DuncanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
David C LandyOrthoVirginia and Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While considerable variation exists regarding patient follow-up after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), little is known regarding patient perceptions. Given the increasing need to deliver cost-efficient care, rising importance of satisfaction scores, and lengthened commutes with market consolidation, understanding patient perceptions and their predictors is important. Methods: A convenience sample of 75 patients was surveyed from the waiting room of an academic arthroplasty practice serving a large geographic catchment area regarding clinic travel and TJA follow-up perceptions. The sample resembled an expected arthroplasty population with 63% women, 46% between 50 and 64 years of age, and 42% having TJA in the past 2 years. Results: Median clinic travel time was 30 minutes (interquartile range, 15-75 minutes) with 15% finding this burdensome and 17% having transportation reliability concerns. Overall, 97% believed TJA follow-up necessary and 94% that it was important to their overall satisfaction with TJA. Regarding initial follow-up, 74% preferred a 2-week in-person visit, though 9% preferred a nurse phone call, and 8% a virtual visit. Demographic factors were not associated with follow-up preferences, though there were strong associations between preference for an alternative follow-up method and both increasing travel time ( Conclusions: While most patients preferred 2-week in-person follow-up, one-fourth preferred an alternative. Increasing travel time and decreased transportation reliability were associated with alternative follow-up preference. As market consolidation increases, it is important that patients have appropriate access to care which may involve more flexible follow-up pathways.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, replacement, hipArthroplasty, replacement, kneePatient navigationPostoperative careRural health

Identifiers

PMID40686659
PMCPMC12272461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.