Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686644›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

Peptide-based therapeutic and delivery strategies for inflammatory bowel disease: challenges and future directions.

Chengmei Ge, Zhen Wang, Yu Wang, Meihao Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chengmei GeNursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou 310000 Zhejiang China weimh@srrsh.com.
Zhen WangNursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou 310000 Zhejiang China weimh@srrsh.com.
Yu WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou 310000 Zhejiang China mushougongx@zju.edu.cn.
Meihao WeiNursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou 310000 Zhejiang China weimh@srrsh.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3585-9869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), remains a challenging chronic disorder with complex pathophysiology and limited therapeutic options. Peptide-based therapeutics have emerged as promising alternatives, offering high specificity, favorable safety profiles, and unique biological activities compared to traditional treatments. However, challenges including enzymatic degradation, poor oral bioavailability, and instability hinder their clinical translation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the sources, structures, and mechanisms of therapeutic peptides for IBD management. We further discuss recent advances in delivery strategies, including PEGylation, nanoparticle (NP) systems (chitosan (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), PLGA, lipid-based carriers, polydopamine (PDA), mesoporous materials), hydrogels, engineered probiotics, and montmorillonite-based composites. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of biomaterials in enhancing peptide stability, targeting specificity, and mucosal adhesion. Key challenges-such as optimizing peptide design, ensuring biosafety, refining delivery systems, and improving preclinical models-are critically analyzed. Prospects suggest that combining smart delivery technologies with data-driven peptide engineering will significantly advance peptide-based therapies for precision IBD management.

Identifiers

PMID40686644
PMCPMC12272339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.