Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686626›Full record

ReviewDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society

Adaptive Response: A Scoping Review of Its Implications in Medicine, Space Exploration, and Beyond.

Abolfazl Kanani, Julianna Krasowska, Krzysztof W Fornalski, Joseph John Bevelacqua, James Welsh, Smj Mortazavi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond Physical Shielding: The Case for Biological Protection in Deep Space.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Zeocin-Induced Adaptive Response inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abolfazl KananiPardis Cancer Research Center, Pardis Cancer Institute, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2002-3587
Julianna KrasowskaFaculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland.
Krzysztof W FornalskiFaculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland.
Joseph John BevelacquaBevelacqua Resources, Richland, WA, USA.
James WelshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
Smj MortazaviIonizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Research Center (INIRPRC), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-2774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Radiation Adaptive Response (AR) is a biological phenomenon in which exposure to low-dose radiation (LDR) enhances an organism's ability to withstand subsequent higher doses. This scoping review explores AR across multiple disciplines, summarizing evidence, identifying research gaps, and evaluating potential applications in cancer therapy, neurodegenerative disease management, space medicine, and pandemic response. Methods: A comprehensive review of experimental/clinical studies on AR was conducted, focusing on molecular mechanisms, biological implications, biophysical modeling, and translational applications. Results: In oncology, AR has shown promise in selectively protecting normal tissues during radiotherapy while sensitizing tumor cells, yet its effects remain cell-type dependent. LDR may manage neurodegenerative diseases by modulating oxidative stress and inflammation. In space medicine, AR-based astronaut selection has been proposed as a novel strategy to mitigate radiation risks during long-term space missions, although empirical validation is lacking. LDR therapy for managing COVID-19 pneumonia has been explored, but ethical concerns and long-term safety risks require further investigation. Conclusion: Despite AR's potential, its clinical and spaceflight implementation requires mechanistic elucidation, standardized protocols, and rigorous studies. The risks of tumorigenesis, individual variability in AR, and potential immunomodulatory effects must be evaluated before widespread application. Moreover, inconsistent AR appearance complicates its study and clinical use.

Indexed as

adaptive responsecancer therapyCOVID-19low-dosespace

Identifiers

PMID40686626
PMCPMC12276503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.