ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Identifying Patients' Preference During Their Hospital Experience. A Sentiment and Topic Analysis of Patient-Experience Comments via Natural Language Techniques.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping online patient reviews onto a data-informed service-experience framework: a content analysis of tertiary hospitals in Wuxi, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Open-ended questions in patient experience surveys provide a valuable opportunity for people to express and discuss their authentic opinions. The analysis of free-text comments can add value to quantitative measures by offering information which matters most to patients and by providing detailed descriptions of the service issues that closed-ended items may not cover. Objective: To extract useful information from large amounts of free-text patient experience comments and to explore differences in patient satisfaction and loyalty between patients who provided negative comments and those who did not. Methods: We collected free-text comments on a broad, open-ended question in a cross-sectional patient satisfaction survey. We adopted a mixed-methods approach involving a literature review, human annotation, and natural language processing technique to analyze free-text comments. The associations of patient satisfaction and loyalty scores with the occurrence of certain patient comments were tested via logistic regression analysis. Results: In total, 28054 free-text comments were collected (comment rate: 72.67%). The accuracy of the machine learning approach and the deep learning approach for topic modeling and sentiment analysis was 0.98 and 0.91 respectively, indicating a satisfactory prediction. Participants tended to leave positive comments (69.0%, 19356/28054). There were 22 patient experience themes discussed in the open-ended comments. The regression analysis showed that the occurrence of negative comments about "humanity of care", "information, communication, and education", "sense of responsibility of staff", "technical competence", "responding to requests", and "continuity of care" was significantly associated with a worse patient satisfaction and loyalty, while the occurrence of negative comments about other aspects of healthcare services had no impact on patient satisfaction and loyalty. Conclusion: The results of this study highlight the interpersonal and functional aspects of care, especially the interpersonal aspects, which are often the "moment of truth" during a service encounter when patients critically evaluate hospital services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.