Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686554›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2025

Engaging patient partners to identify research priorities for atrial fibrillation: Results from a patient engagement day.

Sandra L Carroll, Michael McGillion, Julia Abelson, Alexandre Berkesse, Jeff S Healey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandra L CarrollSchool of Nursing, McMaster University - 2J20, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
Michael McGillionSchool of Nursing, McMaster University - 2J20, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
Julia AbelsonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University - HSC 2C, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
Alexandre BerkesseEHESP French School of Public Health, 15 avenue du Professeur Léon-Bernard - CS74312 - 35043 Rennes cedex, France.
Jeff S HealeyPopulation Health Research Institute, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We describe a Patient Engagement Day from the Canadian Stroke Prevention Network (C-SPIN). Patients and family members were engaged as patient partners to generate and prioritize future direction for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) research. Methods: A facilitated group discussion methodology was used that included a nominal group brainstorming and decision-making technique designed to foster participation and idea generation. Results: Twenty-four patient partners attended. Priorities related to: 1) need for a curative focus and not new medication (84 %), 2) identification of triggers (53 %), and 3) home-based/remote monitoring (53 %). Use of the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) found patient partners understood the intent of the day, with its objectives being met. Findings highlighted knowledge gaps by patient partners that were previously thought to be understood. Conclusion: Patient partners could benefit from more focused education about atrial fibrillation. Notably, the priorities identified by patient partners were new to the research team, reinforcing the importance of engaging with the population who will be impacted by the research. Innovation: Little research has been undertaken examining patient partner priorities regarding atrial fibrillation research. This work highlights patient partners' interest in providing input and shaping future research endeavors.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationPatient partner engagementResearch prioritiesStroke

Identifiers

PMID40686554
PMCPMC12273571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.