The association between attitude, perceived norm, and perceived behavioral control with the provision of Clinical Work-Integrating Care: A reasoned action approach.

Authors Lana Kluit, Annechien Beumer, Coen A M van Bennekom, Angela G E M de Boer, Astrid de Wind

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Authors Lana KluitAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Annechien BeumerAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Coen A M van BennekomAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Angela G E M de BoerAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Astrid de WindAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical Work-Integrating Care (CWIC) brings important attention to issues emerging from the interrelationship between health and work. Yet, for various reasons, CWIC is not routinely delivered in clinical healthcare. This study focuses on why medical specialists do or do not provide CWIC, applying a reasoned action approach. Objective: To examine the associations between attitude, perceived norm, and perceived behavioral control with the provision of CWIC. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to Dutch medical specialists. Multivariable regression analysis was used to investigate the associations between attitude, perceived norm, and perceived behavioral control on the ability to provide CWIC with the frequency of actual CWIC provision. Results: In total, 160 medical specialists completed the survey. The sample consisted of 12 surgical specialists (8 %), 113 non-surgical specialists (71 %), and 35 rehabilitation specialists (22 %). After adjustment for confounders, a favorable attitude was significantly associated with providing CWIC ( Conclusions: Medical specialists who expressed a favorable attitude towards addressing work during consultations were more likely to provide CWIC. Thus, addressing specialists' attitudes is an important element to implementing CWIC.

Indexed as

Clinical work-integrating careHealth care improvementReturn to workSpecialized medical careWork participation

Identifiers

PMID40686550

DOI10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100416

PMCPMC12273432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.