ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2025
Reward masks the learning of cognitive control demand.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Humans do not avoid reactively implementing cognitive control.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive control refers to a set of cognitive functions that modulate other cognitive processes to align with internal goals. Recent research has shown that cognitive control can flexibly adapt to internal and external factors such as reward, effort, and environmental demands. This suggests that learning processes track changes in these factors and drive an optimization process to determine how cognitive control should be applied in changing situations. In real life, multiple factors often simultaneously affect how cognitive control is deployed. However, previous studies mainly concern how cognitive control adjusts to changes in a single factor. Here, we investigate how cognitive control learns to adjust to two concurrently changing factors: statistical regularity in cognitive control demand and performance-contingent reward. We consider two competing hypotheses: reward promotes cognitive control to adjust to cognitive control demand, and the processing of reward information obstructs the adaptation to cognitive control demand. In our experiment, statistical regularity in cognitive control demand is manipulated within subjects such that some stimuli require higher levels of cognitive control than others. Reward is manipulated across subjects. Using a computational model that captures temporal changes in cognitive control, we find that in the absence of reward, participants can adjust to different levels of cognitive control demand. Importantly, when performance-contingent reward is available, participants fail to adapt to changes in cognitive control demand. The findings support the hypothesis that reward blocks the learning of cognitive control. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-025-10307-0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.