ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2025
Novel applications of liquid Biopsy: Comprehensive methodology for circulating biomarker exploration in peripheral blood.
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proof-of-concept study of clinical use of blood-based MAVS biosensor in predicting immunotherapy response in SCLC patients.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy, multi-cancer early detection, and artificial intelligence: new frontiers in cancer screening from a technological and immunological perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The liquid biopsy (LB) represents a minimally invasive method for cancer screening that has been introduced in clinical practice for over a decade and that can accelerate treatment response assessment. LB allows the analysis of tumor cells or tumor-derived products (e.g. cell-free circulating nucleic acids, extracellular vesicles, and proteins) released from primary or metastatic tumor lesions into blood or other body fluids. In the era of immune-oncology, recent evidence indicates that tumor-specific immune responses can be detected in peripheral immune cells. The improvement of knowledge and the standardization of the isolation methods of these techniques will allow the detection and characterization of circulating tumor and immune biomarkers at an early stage as innovative tools to predict response to therapies. Nowadays, the analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), peripheral blood-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) and circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) remains under-developed even if these non-invasive techniques can provide the complete genetic landscape of tumors and allow systematic tracking of cancer evolution. In addition, the evaluation of blood circulating cytokines, and early dynamics changes in the PBMCs of patients with solid tumors represent a promising area of research. Here, we present a comprehensive methodological framework for the evaluation of innovative peripheral blood-derived biomarkers. We also address the current challenges in isolation methods and analysis of PBMC, CTC, EVs and TEPs which are crucial for structuring the large amount of comprehensive information obtained from such samples, with the aim of advancing the translational cancer field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.