ArticleCancer medicine2025
Rural Cancer Survivors' Perceived Delays in Seeking Medical Attention, Diagnosis and Treatment: Findings From a Large Qualitative Study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Declining rural oncologist supply in the United States: a workforce analysis from 2014 to 2025.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Towards equitable cancer outcomes for rural and remote communities: reflections, lessons and recommendations.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Delays in Thoracic Cancer Care: A Data-Linkage, Cohort Study between Primary Care, Hospital, and Registry Data.Health data science · 2026Article
- Socio-Demographic Inequalities in Diagnostic Delays of Breast Cancer: A Multistage Time-to-Diagnosis Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Rural Cancer Survivors' Perceived Delays in Seeking Medical Attention, Diagnosis and Treatment: Findings From a Large Qualitative Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo investigate rural cancer survivors' self-reported reasons for perceived delays in initial cancer detection and treatment.
methodsWithin a cohort study, adult cancer survivors who had travelled > 50 km for cancer care, staying at subsidised accommodation lodges in city centres in Queensland, Australia, were invited to complete a structured interview on perceived delays in: (i) seeking medical attention, (ii) receiving their diagnosis and (iii) commencing treatment. Content analysis was used to map self-reported reasons for perceived delays at each step, which were then categorised based on the perceived source: (i) personal, (ii) healthcare professional, (iii) healthcare system or (iv) other. The self-reported reasons and perceived sources were summarised using descriptive statistics.
resultsSix hundred and eighty-six rural cancer survivors completed the interview (18% breast, 15% head and neck, 12% prostate and 12% skin cancer). Almost half (n = 320, 47%) of participants perceived a delay at one or more steps. Delays in seeking medical attention were perceived by 132 (19%) participants, mostly related to personal factors (n = 67, 51%), including misinterpreting (n = 19, 28%) signs and symptoms. Delays in diagnosis were perceived by 161 (23%) participants, mostly related to healthcare professional factors (n = 86, 53%), including requiring further opinions or testing for diagnosis (n = 30, 35%). Delays in commencing treatment were perceived by 157 (23%) participants, mostly due to healthcare system factors (n = 57, 37%), including long waitlists (n = 39, 68%). Of the participants who perceived a delay in commencing treatment, comparison with timeframes recommended in the relevant Optimal Care Pathway identified that 57% of perceived delays were actual delays.
conclusionsPerceived delays in the pathway to initial cancer detection and treatment are common among rural cancer survivors. Improvements in patient-clinician communication could reduce perceived delays, particularly in diagnosis and treatment. Promoting early help-seeking, participation in cancer screening and improving access to diagnostic and treatment infrastructure may also improve care experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.