ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2026
Artificial intelligence in radiology: diagnostic sensitivity of ChatGPT for detecting hemorrhages in cranial computed tomography scans.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of ChatGPT-4o in Identifying Anatomical Structures on Cadaveric Images: A Practical Anatomy Examination Study.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: Comment on the diagnostic sensitivity of ChatGPT for detecting hemorrhages in cranial computed tomography scans.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Reply: Comment on the diagnostic sensitivity of ChatGPT for detecting hemorrhages in cranial computed tomography scans.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4V, a large language model developed by OpenAI, has been explored for its potential application in radiology. This study assesses ChatGPT-4V's diagnostic performance in identifying various types of intracranial hemorrhages in non-contrast cranial computed tomography (CT) images.
methodsIntracranial hemorrhages were presented to ChatGPT using the clearest 2D imaging slices. The first question, "Q1: Which imaging technique is used in this image?" was asked to determine the imaging modality. ChatGPT was then prompted with the second question, "Q2: What do you see in this image and what is the final diagnosis?" to assess whether the CT scan was normal or showed pathology. For CT scans containing hemorrhage that ChatGPT did not interpret correctly, a follow-up question-"Q3: There is bleeding in this image. Which type of bleeding do you see?"-was used to evaluate whether this guidance influenced its response.
resultsChatGPT accurately identified the imaging technique (Q1) in all cases but demonstrated difficulty diagnosing epidural hematoma (EDH), subdural hematoma (SDH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) when no clues were provided (Q2). When a hemorrhage clue was introduced (Q3), ChatGPT correctly identified EDH in 16.7% of cases, SDH in 60%, and SAH in 15.6%, and achieved 100% diagnostic accuracy for hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease. Its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for Q2 were 23.6%, 92.5%, and 57.4%, respectively. These values improved substantially with the clue in Q3, with sensitivity rising to 50.9% and accuracy to 71.3%. ChatGPT also demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy in larger hemorrhages in EDH and SDH images.
conclusionAlthough the model performs well in recognizing imaging modalities, its diagnostic accuracy substantially improves when guided by additional contextual information. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that ChatGPT's diagnostic performance improves with guided prompts, highlighting its potential as a supportive tool in clinical radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.