Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686449›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2026

Artificial intelligence in radiology: diagnostic sensitivity of ChatGPT for detecting hemorrhages in cranial computed tomography scans.

Olga Bayar-Kapıcı, Erman Altunışık, Feyza Musabeyoğlu, Şeyda Dev, Ömer Kaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olga Bayar-KapıcıSeyhan State Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0863-9127
Erman AltunışıkUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Gaziantep City Hospital, Clinic of Neurology, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5996-2090
Feyza MusabeyoğluUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Gaziantep City Hospital, Clinic of Neurology, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0001-8275-4708
Şeyda DevUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Gaziantep City Hospital, Clinic of Neurology, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0006-9246-2748
Ömer KayaÇukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-0686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4V, a large language model developed by OpenAI, has been explored for its potential application in radiology. This study assesses ChatGPT-4V's diagnostic performance in identifying various types of intracranial hemorrhages in non-contrast cranial computed tomography (CT) images.

methodsIntracranial hemorrhages were presented to ChatGPT using the clearest 2D imaging slices. The first question, "Q1: Which imaging technique is used in this image?" was asked to determine the imaging modality. ChatGPT was then prompted with the second question, "Q2: What do you see in this image and what is the final diagnosis?" to assess whether the CT scan was normal or showed pathology. For CT scans containing hemorrhage that ChatGPT did not interpret correctly, a follow-up question-"Q3: There is bleeding in this image. Which type of bleeding do you see?"-was used to evaluate whether this guidance influenced its response.

resultsChatGPT accurately identified the imaging technique (Q1) in all cases but demonstrated difficulty diagnosing epidural hematoma (EDH), subdural hematoma (SDH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) when no clues were provided (Q2). When a hemorrhage clue was introduced (Q3), ChatGPT correctly identified EDH in 16.7% of cases, SDH in 60%, and SAH in 15.6%, and achieved 100% diagnostic accuracy for hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease. Its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for Q2 were 23.6%, 92.5%, and 57.4%, respectively. These values improved substantially with the clue in Q3, with sensitivity rising to 50.9% and accuracy to 71.3%. ChatGPT also demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy in larger hemorrhages in EDH and SDH images.

conclusionAlthough the model performs well in recognizing imaging modalities, its diagnostic accuracy substantially improves when guided by additional contextual information. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that ChatGPT's diagnostic performance improves with guided prompts, highlighting its potential as a supportive tool in clinical radiology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIntracranial HemorrhagesRadiologyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySubarachnoid HemorrhageArtificial intelligenceChatGPTcomputed tomographyhematomaintracranial hemorrhages

Identifiers

PMID40686449
PMCPMC12766335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.