ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2025
Psychometric Evaluation of Two Adult Autism Screening Tools in Brazil.
Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed Diagnosis and Missed Opportunities for Early Autism Identification in Brazil: An Exploratory Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Psychometric Evaluation of Two Adult Autism Screening Tools in Brazil.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025Article
- Diagnostic challenges of autism spectrum disorder in women without intellectual or language impairments: a narrative review.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite increasing rates of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in many countries, substantial evidence suggests persistent underdiagnosis of ASD in many low and middle-income countries, such as Brazil. Underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis may be particularly prevalent among women who often present subtler social and behavioral characteristics, engage in camouflaging strategies, and exhibit different symptom expressions compared to men. This study evaluates two new instruments to improve screening for ASD among adults in Brazil: the Screening for Autism in Adults (SfA-A) and the Screening for Autism in Females (SfA-F). A sample of 3302 Brazilian adults (mean age = 37.55 ± 11.34 years) completed the SfA-A, while 7738 Brazilian adult women (mean age = 38.77 ± 10.28 years) completed the SfA-F. Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling was conducted. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and test-retest. Criterion validity was determined by the AQ-10 and two autism-related questions. Norms were established based on percentiles. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the SfA-A and SfA-F exhibited strong model fit, high internal consistency (α > 0.8), and initial evidence of criterion-related validity. The SfA-A and SfA-F were developed to address critical gaps in ASD screening among adults in Brazil. These tools hold promise for identifying ASD symptoms and can be used to initiate formal ASD evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.