ArticleJournal of hospital medicine2026
Increased lumbar puncture success using a paramedian approach: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of hospital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture: A Narrative Review With Implications for Educators in the Clinical Neurosciences.Neurology. Education · 2026Review
- Increased lumbar puncture success using a paramedian approach: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLumbar puncture (LP) is frequently necessary in hospitalized patients for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Traditional landmark identification by palpation of the lumbar spine and pelvis can see significant failure rates. A paramedian approach is an accepted, though less frequently used technique associated with higher success rates for spinal access in anesthesia when aided by ultrasound. Similarly, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the paramedian acoustic window may help guide a paramedian LP technique.
objectiveTo compare the probability of success before and after the implementation of a standardized training curriculum for lumbar punctures (LPs) performed by the Hospital Medicine Procedure Service (HMPS).
methodsThe HMPS at the University of Minnesota Medical Center (UMMC), a large tertiary academic medical center, implemented a standardized training for an ultrasound-assisted paramedian (USPM) approach to all bedside lumbar punctures (LPs) and then conducted a retrospective review comparing success rates between the traditional midline (ML) and USPM approaches.
resultsA total of 269 LPs were performed on hospitalized patients. Before standardization, the probability of a successful LP was 72.6% using ML approach. After standardization, using a USPM approach, the probability of a successful LP was 85.4%. The probability of a successful procedure was 13.6 (95% confidence interval: 2.8, 24.4, p = .014) percentage points higher for the USPM approach when compared to the ML approach and accounting for sex, age, BMI, and if the LP was for chemotherapy.
conclusionsInstitutions with a HMPS should consider transitioning to use of the USPM approach for bedside LPs, which is associated with a higher probability of success and reduced utilization of more resource-intensive hospital services, such as Interventional Radiology or Neuroradiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.