Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40686308›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

A single-center study of the RED 72 reperfusion catheter with SENDit technology in proximal large vessel occlusions.

Vidhya Dhar, Pablo Valdes Barrera, Sajal Medha K Akkipeddi, Aditya Gunturi, Neil Dogra, Derrek Schartz, Matthew J Cotroneo, Clifton Houk, Lewis Thompson, Nathaniel R Ellens and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Microguidewire stiffness for microcatheter and aspiration catheter navigation in tortuous vessels.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Vidhya DharDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-2212-0858
Pablo Valdes BarreraDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Sajal Medha K AkkipeddiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Aditya GunturiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Neil DograDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Derrek SchartzDepartment of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3247-0854
Matthew J CotroneoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Clifton HoukDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Lewis ThompsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8057-7824
Nathaniel R EllensDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6901-1160
Charles MatoukDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3234-9541
Vincent N NguyenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Thomas K MattinglyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2949-5521
Tarun BhallaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Matthew T BenderDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDelivery assist catheters are a new class of devices designed to better navigate tortuous segments and reach the clot interface in mechanical thrombectomy. The RED 72 aspiration catheter with SENDit technology is one such example. SENDit is a novel tapered obturator used instead of a microcatheter to bring up the RED 72. It was designed to speed materials setup and overcome "ledge" effect. This case series aims to assess the safety, efficacy, and associated materials costs of SENDit in a postmarket study.MethodsThis was a single-institution retrospective case series of endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusions affecting the internal carotid artery, M1, or M2 treated with SENDit between August 2023 and May 2024. Demographic, clinical, and cost variables were collected.ResultsMedian time from groin puncture to first pass was 14.0 min, and median time from groin puncture to recanalization was 25.0 min. Modified first-pass effect (mTICI ≥2b) was achieved in 51.4% of cases. The final recanalization mTICI ≥2b rate was 91.9%. A stentriever was required for 10.8% of cases. The rate of functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 3 months follow-up was 43.8%. The average materials cost per case was $7517.40 ± $2795.25; 10.8% of patients experienced access site complications. There was no artery dissection, and the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was 5.4%.ConclusionIn this case series, SENDit achieved a high rate of first pass effect, rapid recanalization, and low stentriever use and materials cost. It is safe given the low rate of procedural complications and favorable clinical outcomes. Delivery assist catheters are a promising alternative to stentrievers.

Indexed as

Acute ischemic strokecatheterdelivery assist catheterendovascular thrombectomymechanical thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID40686308
PMCPMC12279763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.